|Pacquiao vs. Bradley, Adamek vs. Chambers, Ward vs. Dawson, Judges, Punchstats and more...
By Danny Serratelli (June 20, 2012) Doghouse Boxing (Photo © German Villasenor, Doghouse)
After watching the most recent Pacquiao
vs. Marquez fight I had it scored 115-113 Pacquiao. After watching it again with no sound….115-113
Pacquiao, identical card. It was a close
fight and I believe Manny won, but I do not understand how people can complain
of a robbery in a close fight with many rounds that could have went either way. If you know how to score a fight, you know
that around 115-113 either way is a fair score. A one or two point fight, in a fight with many
close rounds can not be a “robbery”.
- After watching Pacquiao vs.
Bradley, listening to the commentary by the HBO team and seeing the punchstats
I had the fight, 117-111 Pacquiao. After
watching it again with no sound……115-113 Pacquiao. While I still disagree with the decision, I
do not feel the judges were as far off as I did initially and everyone has
reported. While Bradley boxed well, he definitely
did not put on a clinic in the last 6 rounds.
- Every boxing official I know…. and
I know a lot, take their jobs very seriously. I have good relationships with some of the best in the business. Despite
the fact that I may disagree with them at times, I usually agree with
them. When I do disagree I do not
question their integrity. There are so
many factors that impact any human beings judgment no matter how unbiased, well
trained and experienced they are. While
there are judges that do seem inconsistent and some that seem unqualified, it
is the exception and it doesn’t come up as much as people have been
saying. Watching a 12 round fight and
saying who you think wins is totally different than scoring 12 individual
rounds, adding it up and seeing who should win under the rules, more “fans” and
boxing people need to remember that.
- I had Chambers winning the fight
against Adamek from my view at ringside, and I am a Adamek fan. I had it 115-113. To be honest, I was surprised that it seemed
that 90% of the press at ringside had Adamek, and even more so that most had
him ahead comfortably. It’s a fight I’d
like to watch again on television. He fought
with one arm from about the second round and impressed me a lot. You can not judge a fight on a curve, and I
didn’t feel I did, but people do it all the time.
- I have disagreed with people on
this one, but I feel I can judge the fight better on television than at
ringside. While the commentary and
punchstats can impact a person’s judgment, there are things you miss from
ringside depending on your vantage point and I also feel that the atmosphere
can impact even the most astute boxing fans and members of the press. However, the judges are in the best position
to do it from ringside.
- I have nothing against punchstat
numbers, but there have been many fights over the years where they seem
inaccurate. Often I see the fighter who
appears to be the busier fighter reported as having thrown less punches or a
fighter who seems more accurate landing at a lower percentage. The most misleading to the casual boxing fan
is the “power punches” stat. It is
misleading because many of the shots credited as power punches are far from
power punches, they are simply not jabs. Some fighters throw a harder jab than others
throw their “power punches”
- While they are both exceptional
fighters, Andre Ward will beat Chad Dawson fairly easily. John Skully has done a great job with the
talented Dawson, but if Ward
can stay busy and healthy people may start putting him on top of the pound for
pound list by years end.
For much more from Danny, you should also visit:
NEW: Follow Doghouse Boxing on FaceBook!
For more Boxing News 24/7 and so much more...
visit our homepage now!